
[typography font="Droid Serif" size="22" size_format="px" color="#660000"]Obama assembling de facto propaganda ministry[/typography]
The U.S. State Department is planning to “buy” media broadcasts, as the Obama administration assembles a de facto propaganda machine, according to documents that reveal the president’s plans moving closer to the 2012 election.
According to information WND located via routine database research, State’s Bureau of Public Affairs is soliciting the help of “global news coverage service providers” to create and disseminate department “news.”
The selected contractor will provide “full-time, 24/7 service,” the Statement of Work for the plan said.
“The department seeks a service provider for full, turn-key news-style global television coverage of ad hoc open press events featuring the Secretary of State and other officials across the United States and throughout the world,” according to the SOW, “and to send this content back to the department’s Washington headquarters…”
Upon receiving these privately packaged productions, the department, in turn, “will distribute this video content to media organizations through an array of traditional and new media platforms.”
Indeed, just as the department is awaiting contractor bids on the project, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s representative at the World Press Freedom Day in Tunisia heaped accolades upon UNESCO for hosting the annual event.
The State Department plan is twofold: to hire a single contractor to provide television news crew services on the one hand, and to provide transmission/streaming services as a corollary service.
“The television news crew category is both one and two-person crews, and includes one and multi-camera productions,” the SOW pointed out. “The transmission category includes both traditional fiber, terrestrial and satellite-based as well as file-based and Internet delivery platforms.”
The use of such government- as well as industry-funded broadcasts, known as “video news releases,” or VNRs, has increasingly come under fire in the past decade.
VNRs “are segments designed to be indistinguishable from independently produced news reports that are distributed and promoted to television newsrooms,” according to Source Watch, a Center for Media and Democracy project that chronicles the intersecting of public relations and public policy.
Use of VNRs is illegal if not clearly identified as such. Last year the FCC fined a Fox affiliate $4,000 for airing a General Motors VNR during a newscast without clarification. But I’m sure Uncle Barack can get around that little technicality, especially if there’s one channel dedicated to their VNRs. As my friend said, “totally unbiased, of course, and certainly objective in it’s reporting of the government itself”.
Remember, we have always been at war with Eastasia.


So, who believes what they see on the “news” anymore, anyhow?
Nobody I know.
Who watches the news anymore?
No idea!
That top picture scares the crap out of me.
Me too. Have you seen 1984? I highly recommend the 1984 version starring John Hurt. Terrifying! Mostly because there are more and more parallels between the fiction and reality…
Better to die on your feet than live on your knees.
Yep, I saw it. I hated the cage of rats.
I hated the whole damn thing but was riveted! Hate when that happens…
shudder