I’m so sick of the party line; you know the one: ‘We’re the terrorists; Saddam had no WMDs!’
Posted By Uncle Jimbo • [September 15, 2011]
Right? Wrong.
When American tanks smashed into Baghdad, Saddam had already completed construction of an anthrax production facility, which was a week away from going live. If it had been permitted to go into production, this one facility could have produced ten tons of weaponized anthrax a year. Experts estimate that anthrax spores that infect the skin will kill 50 percent of untreated victims. Inhaled anthrax will kill 100 percent of untreated victims and 50 percent of those receiving immediate treatment. That means that a mere 1 percent of Saddam’s annual production (200 pounds) sprayed by crop-duster over New York City would have killed upwards of three million people.
And there’s more, much more. The author got this info from the Duelfer Report and notes that most people only read the exec summary. There was plenty of nastiness, and while he wasn’t linked to the 9/11 attacks he played with plenty of terrorists. The left loves to whine about WMD lies, false reports and no ties to terror. Yeah well that is just BS. He was a menace, murderous tyrant and a known user of chemical weapons. We were and truly justified in taking him out and the world ought to be thanking us.
Of course nothing could ever vindicate Bush in their eyes… he will ever be Satan to them.
























16. September 2011 at 10:59 am
These would be the same people that drank the “Yes We Can” Kool-Aid and are foaming at the mouth of his American Jobs bill that he’s trying to pull over our eyes.
Saw a commercial for it this morning – and I definitely
puked. He’s grandstanding in front of Congress, “We have 14 months left on this job and many American’s don’t have 14 months left to wait.” No assbag, you’ve waited until 14 months before you’ll be OUT OF A JOB to realize that you’ve wasted the last 34 months and we’re sick and tired of you, your cracked policies AND your American Apology Tour of 2008, 2009 and 2010! So (pardon me Pam) FUCK YOU
and the lame horse you rode in on. You better hope that thing has got a strong enough back to carry you, MOO and your kids back out of town. Don’t forget where you parked!
Gad, Republicans – you wanna do something and take this guy down, then get your acts together and start working because you’re not helping anyone yet!
As you were people…
16. September 2011 at 11:03 am
17. September 2011 at 12:09 am
I don’t remember the name of the city but on the run north there were several barrles with the residue of one of the nastier gasses. This town was on either the Tigris or the Euphrates, I disrember. At any rate there was a huge fish kill in the Gulf shortly after, about the time it would have take some awful chemical to float gently down the stream.
Funny how this wasn’t much in the news, only on the Milblogs.
17. September 2011 at 7:20 am
There’s so much that shows up no place but the milblogs! I only follow a few, but I’m grateful for the wealth of information.
17. September 2011 at 1:50 pm
If you are found to have a sawed off shotgun, know what you are charged with? WMD charges. Fully automatic weapon? You guessed it. If we are going to call a sawed off shotgun or a machine gun a WMD in this country, then hell yeah Sadam had WMDs. And lots of them.
17. September 2011 at 2:05 pm
But he did. Not just shotguns. Chemical weapons.
17. September 2011 at 2:35 pm
I know! It irritates the crap out of me when people say he didn’t and those on our side just sit there and let them say it. He had them. Lots of them. Erg.
17. September 2011 at 3:35 pm
Erg? Frustration?
17. September 2011 at 9:21 pm
Hell even that idiot Hans Blix said he had them. I read his entire report that came out right before the invasion.
18. September 2011 at 9:07 am
So why is ‘no wmd’ the line thrown out at every opportunity? Why does the media still report that?
It’s… surreal.